Gordon N. Ridley v. The State of Texas Appeal from 264th District Court of Bell County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. NO. NO. NO. 03-18-00791-CR 03-18-00792-CR 03-18-00793-CR 03-18-00794-CR Gordon N. Ridley, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, NOS. 77244, 76603, 77191, 77814, THE HONORABLE JOHN GAUNTT, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Gordon N. Ridley seeks to appeal judgments of conviction for three counts of possession of a controlled substance and one count of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. See Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.115(c), (d). The trial court has certified that (1) these are plea-bargain cases and Ridley has no right of appeal, and (2) Ridley has waived the right of appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). __________________________________________ Jeff Rose, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Jeff Rose, Justices Field and Toth Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: December 21, 2018 Do Not Publish 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.