The State of Texas v. Julio Baeza Appeal from County Court at Law No. 4 of Travis County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-18-00579-CR NO. 03-18-00580-CR NO. 03-18-00581-CR The State of Texas, Appellant v. Julio Baeza, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF TRAVIS COUNTY, NOS. C-1-CR-15-218716, C-1-CR-15-218717, C-1-CR-16-400605 THE HONORABLE MIKE DENTON, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant the State of Texas filed its notice of appeal in these cases on September 4, 2018. On September 7, 2018, appellee Julio Baeza filed an agreed motion for new trial and motion in arrest of dismissal. See Tex. R. App. P. 21, 22. The trial court granted the motion for new trial on September 13, 2018. Granting a new trial restores the case to its position before the former trial. Id. R. 21.9(b); see also id. R. 22.6(a) (“If judgment is arrested the defendant is restored to the position that he or she had before the indictment or information was presented.”). We have no jurisdiction to consider the merits of an appeal after the grant of a motion for new trial. See Glaze v. State, 675 S.W.2d 768, 769-70 (Tex. Crim. App. 1984) (holding that neither court of appeals nor court of criminal appeals has jurisdiction to consider the merits of a case unless there is a final conviction from which to appeal); Waller v. State, 931 S.W.2d 640, 643-44 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1996, no pet.) (determining that appellate court had no jurisdiction to review appeal because trial court’s granting of a motion for new trial left no sentence to be appealed); see also Gallup v. State, No. 03-11-00683-CR, 2012 WL 5192814, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 19, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing appeal as moot after trial court granted motion for new trial). Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction. __________________________________________________ Cindy Olson Bourland, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: October 2, 2018 Do Not Publish 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.