David E. Jones v. Dr. Alissa Sherry; Alissa Sherry Consulting, PLLC; Legal Consensus, PLLC;, Michelle Munevar; et al. Appeal from 261st District Court of Travis County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-18-00279-CV David E. Jones, Appellant v. Dr. Alissa Sherry; Alissa Sherry Consulting, PLLC; Legal Consensus, PLLC; Michelle Munevar, Appellees FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-17-006851, HONORABLE JOHN K. DIETZ, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on May 21, 2018. On May 30, 2018, we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due to his failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status report regarding this appeal by June 11, 2018. Further, the notice advised appellant that his failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to this Court’s notice, and the clerk’s record has not been filed. If a trial-court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellant has not established that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. Because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. __________________________________________ Scott K. Field, Justice Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: June 21, 2018 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
