Steven B. Aubrey, Individually, and as Beneficiary of, on behalf of, and for the benefit of the Aubrey Family Trust v. United Heritage Credit Union; Wilford P. Schroeder, Jr.; Betsy S. Aubrey, Individually and as Trustee and Income Beneficiary of the Aubrey Family Trust; Richard B. Aubrey, Jr., Individually, and as Remainder Beneficiary of the Aubrey Family Trust; et al. Appeal from 353rd District Court of Travis County (memorandum opinion )

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-16-00233-CV Steven B. Aubrey, Individually, and as Beneficiary of, on behalf of, and for the benefit of the Aubrey Family Trust, Appellant v. United Heritage Credit Union; Wilford P. Schroeder, Jr.; Betsy S. Aubrey, Individually and as Trustee and Income Beneficiary of the Aubrey Family Trust; Richard B. Aubrey, Jr., Individually, and as Remainder Beneficiary of the Aubrey Family Trust; and Thomas A. Aubrey, Remainder Beneficiary of the Aubrey Family Trust, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-15-003836, HONORABLE KARIN CRUMP, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION On May 11, 2016, this Court sent notice to appellant that the clerk’s record and reporter’s record were due in this Court on May 9, 2016, and that notice was received from the district clerk that no payment had been received or arrangements made for payment for the clerk’s record. This Court requested that appellant make arrangements for the record and submit a status report. Appellant was notified that his appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution if he did not respond to this Court by May 23, 2016. To date, appellant has not responded to the Court’s notice. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c). __________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: June 17, 2016 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.