Jermaine A. Hopkins v. The City of Austin; Marc Ott; Hubert "Art" Acevedo; Elizabeth Alvarado; City of Austin Communications and Technology Management Department; City of Austin Human Resources Department; City of Austin Office of the City Clerk; et al. Appeal from 419th District Court of Travis County (opinion by chief justice rose)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-16-00204-CV Jermaine A. Hopkins, Appellant v. The City of Austin; Marc Ott; Hubert “Art” Acevedo; Elizabeth Alvarado; City of Austin Communications and Technology Management Department; City of Austin Human Resources Department; City of Austin Office of the City Clerk; City of Austin Office of the Police Monitor; City of Austin Law Department; City of Austin Police Department; Eloy del Bosque; Michael “Mike” Cronig; Cathy Curtis; David Douglas; Stephen Elkin; David Escamilla; Margo Frasier; Louis Gonzales; Jannette Goodall; Elizabeth Cary Grace; Marci Graham; Patricia Gutierrez; Joya Hayes; Karen Kennard; Sandra Kim; David Lothery; Brian Manley; Michael McDonald; Andrew Michael; Renee Moore; Anne Morgan; Elaine Nicholson; Catherine Riley; Meghan Riley; Lee Rogers; Allen Smiley; Todd Smith; Ann Spiegel; Cynthia Tom; Desta Walker; Mark Washington; and Beverly West, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 419TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-15-000927, HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Jermaine A. Hopkins filed a notice of appeal on March 28, 2016. On May 10, 2016, the Clerk of this Court sent a letter notifying Hopkins that the clerk’s record was overdue and requesting that Hopkins make payment arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status report regarding this appeal. The overdue-record notice also informed Hopkins that failure to make payment arrangements or respond to the Court’s notice by May 20, 2016, could subject this appeal to dismissal for want of prosecution. To date, Hopkins has not responded to the notice, the clerk’s record in this cause has not been filed, and the district clerk has not received any payment. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). __________________________________________ Jeff Rose, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Bourland Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: June 23, 2016 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
