Namken Construction, Inc. and Brandon Namken v. Jeffrey Anderson and Cynthia Anderson Appeal from 428th District Court of Hays County (memorandum opinion by chief justice rose)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-15-00224-CV Namken Construction, Inc. and Brandon Namken, Appellants v. Jeffrey Anderson and Cynthia Anderson, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 428TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 14-1456, HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellants Namken Construction, Inc. and Brandon Namken have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, which appellees Jeffrey Anderson and Cynthia Anderson do not oppose, because the trial court granted appellants’ motion for new trial.1 See Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care Sys., 160 S.W.3d 559, 563 (Tex. 2005) (“[W]hen the trial court grants a motion for new trial, the court essentially wipes the slate clean and starts over.”). There is no longer a final and appealable judgment over which we may exercise jurisdiction. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). 1 Appellants provided a file-stamped copy of the trial court’s signed order granting their motion for new trial in the underlying suit. __________________________________________ Jeff Rose, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: June 25, 2015 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
