Robert Emrich v. Federal National Mortgage Association a/k/a Fannie Mae Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 of Hays County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-15-00114-CV Robert Emrich, Appellant v. Federal National Mortgage Association a/k/a Fannie Mae, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF HAYS COUNTY NO. 14-0668-C, HONORABLE ROBERT UPDEGROVE, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Robert Emrich filed his notice of appeal on February 19, 2015. That day, we notified him that he was required to make a written request and arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record within ten days from his receipt of our letter. The clerk’s record from the trial court was due to be filed in this Court on April 13. On June 4, this Court notified Emrich that no clerk’s record had been filed due to his failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The Court’s notice requested that Emrich make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status report regarding this appeal by June 15. In addition, the notice informed Emrich that his appeal was subject to dismissal if he did not comply with our instructions. To date, Emrich has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to this Court’s notice, and the clerk’s record has not been filed. If the trial court’s clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, Emrich has not established that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, see Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (providing procedure for establishing indigence on appeal), and he has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). __________________________________________ Cindy Olson Bourland, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Bourland Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: June 19, 2015 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
