Frank Arrevalo v. The State of TexasAppeal from 27th District Court of Bell County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-12-00775-CR Frank Arrevalo, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 69426, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Frank Arrevalo is attempting to appeal from a judgment of conviction for the offense of injury to an elderly person. The district court imposed sentence on August 27, 2012, and no motion for new trial was filed. Thus, the deadline for perfecting appeal was September 26, 2012. Arrevalo filed a pro se notice of appeal on November 15, 2012, asserting that his appointed trial counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal on his behalf. Subsequently, the district court appointed appellate counsel to represent Arrevalo, and counsel filed an amended notice of appeal on November 26, 2012. Absent a timely filed notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction to dispose of this appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.1 __________________________________________ Bob Pemberton, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: June 21, 2013 Do Not Publish 1 Any remedy Arrevalo may have for a late-filed notice of appeal would be sought through a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
