In re Aaron Angel Gregory Johnson--Appeal from 119th District Court of Tom Green County (majority)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-12-00001-CV In re Aaron Angel Gregory Johnson ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TOM GREEN COUNTY MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator Aaron Angel Gregory Johnson, an inmate, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004). In the petition, Johnson asks this Court to grant him relief by way of remanding his application [for writ of habeas corpus] back to the district court and ordering it to hear his writ. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2011). The exclusive post-conviction remedy in final felony convictions in Texas courts is through a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the code of criminal procedure. Id.; Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 525 n.8 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). While a post-conviction application for habeas relief under article 11.07 must be filed in the court of original conviction, that court does not decide the merits of the application, but simply makes any necessary findings of fact and forwards the record to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for a final ruling. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, §§ 3, 5. Only the court of criminal appeals has jurisdiction over post-conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Ex parte Martinez, 175 S.W.3d 510, 512-13 (Tex. App. Texarkana 2005, orig. proceeding). Because Johnson s petition for mandamus relief is based on the trial court s failure to act on his post-conviction writ of habeas corpus, we lack jurisdiction over his complaint. See McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992). The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). __________________________________________ Diane M. Henson, Justice Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson Filed: May 30, 2012 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.