Charles Ray Harris v. The State of Texas--Appeal from County Court at Law of Bastrop County (majority)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-11-00452-CR Charles Ray Harris, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF BASTROP COUNTY, NO. 48,418, THE HONORABLE BENTON ESKEW, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION A jury convicted Charles Ray Harris of the traffic offense of speeding and assessed a $200 fine. See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. 545.352 (West Supp. 2012). The trial court assessed punishment in accordance with the jury s verdict at a fine of $200, plus court costs. Harris filed a pro se notice of appeal of his conviction. Harris s brief was originally due on October 19, 2011, but was not filed. On November 30, 2011, this Court s clerk sent a notice to Harris informing him that his brief was overdue and requesting a response by December 30, 2011. On December 27, 2011, Harris filed a motion for extension of time to file his brief. This Court granted an extension of time to file the brief until February 6, 2012. No brief was filed. On February 16, 2012, this Court s clerk sent a second notice to Harris informing him that his brief was overdue and requesting a response by February 27, 2012. On March 1, 2012, we received a letter from Harris expressing that he viewed the filing of an appellate brief as impractical and unnecessary and requested that this Court rule on his appeal based on the existing record without recourse to any further hearing in the trial court. Rule 38.8 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that under appropriate circumstances, the appellate court may consider the appeal without briefs, as justice may require. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(4); see Lott v. State, 874 S.W.2d 687, 688 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994) (affirming conviction on record alone where appellant failed to file a pro se brief after being properly admonished). Harris has chosen not to file a brief on his behalf in this appeal. We therefore submitted the case without the benefit of briefs and, in the interest of justice, reviewed the entire record brought forth in this appeal. We find no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed. __________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Henson and Goodwin Affirmed Filed: September 12, 2012 Do Not Publish 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
