The State of Texas v. Stearman Construction, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company, and Steven Stearman, a/k/a Steven Ray Stearman, Individually--Appeal from 345th District Court of Travis County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00150-CV Stearman Construction, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company, and Steven Stearman, a/k/a Steven Ray Stearman, Individually, Appellants // The State of Texas, Cross-Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee// Stearman Construction, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company, and Steven Stearman, a/k/a Steven Ray Stearman, Individually, Cross-Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. S-1-GV-09-001640, HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA-DOYAL, JUDGE PRESIDING ORDER PER CURIAM Appellants Stearman Construction, LLC, and Steven Stearman filed a notice of appeal on March 8, 2010. Appellants brief was originally due May 7, but the deadline was extended to June 28. Cross-appellant the State of Texas filed its appellant s brief on June 4. On June 30, appellants attorney filed a motion to withdraw, and that motion was granted on July 26. On January 14, 2011, we notified appellants that their brief was overdue, asking for a response no later than January 24 and cautioning appellants that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution if timely action was not taken. To date, appellants have not responded to our notice. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). The State s crossappeal will continue, styled The State of Texas v. Stearman Construction, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company, and Steven Stearman, a/k/a Steven Ray Stearman, Individually. The Stearman parties, now appellees, have until June 3 to file their appellees brief. If an appellees brief is not filed, the Court will proceed to consider the appeal based only on the State s brief and the appellate record. Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose Filed: May 4, 2011 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
