Jasmine Charmaine Herndon v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services--Appeal from 201st District Court of Travis County (majority)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-11-00030-CV Jasmine Charmaine Herndon, Appellant v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 201ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-FM-08-006268, HONORABLE SCOTT H. JENKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION After appellant filed her notice of appeal, the clerk s record was filed in this Court on January 7, 2011, and the reporter s record was filed on February 10, 2011. Appellant s appointed counsel filed and was granted two motions for extension of time to file the brief, but on April 4, 2011, the trial court signed an order allowing counsel to withdraw from the case. After appellant failed to respond to our notices related to the cause, we abated the appeal, asking the trial court to hold a hearing to determine whether appellant still wished to pursue the appeal, whether she was indigent, and whether new appellate counsel should be appointed. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(2); In re T.V., 8 S.W.3d 448, 449-50 (Tex. App. Waco 1999, order) (holding that to adequately protect indigent parent s rights in termination case, court should abate appeal to allow trial court to hold hearing to determine issues raised in Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)); see also Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3). The court has provided a supplemental clerk s record containing an order signed after the requested hearing. The court determined that appellant had abandoned her appeal and found that it was not necessary to appoint new appellate counsel and that appellant had not brought forth any evidence to prove she was indigent. The trial court recommended that the appeal be dismissed. Appellant has not filed any kind of response to the supplemental clerk s record or to any of our notices, dating back to July 2011. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). __________________________________________ David Puryear, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Henson and Goodwin Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: March 13, 2012 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
