Jay Sandon Cooper v. County of Travis; Austin Independent School District; City of Austin; Travis County Healthcare District; Austin Community College District; and William B. Cochran, Court Appointed Receiver/Trustee--Appeal from 261st District Court of Travis County

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00443-CV Jay Sandon Cooper, Appellant v. County of Travis; Austin Independent School District; City of Austin; Travis County Healthcare District; Austin Community College District; and William B. Cochran, Court Appointed Receiver/Trustee, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GV-99-009504, HONORABLE JOHN K. DIETZ, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Jay Sandon Cooper has filed a motion for extension of time to file his appellate brief, informing this Court that he has filed for bankruptcy protection (United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas, case number 08-42689). Accordingly, his appeal is stayed. See 11 U.S.C. § 362; Tex. R. App. P. 8.2 (“A bankruptcy suspends the appeal and all periods in these rules from the date when the bankruptcy petition is filed until the appellate court reinstates or severs the appeal in accordance with federal law.”). During the bankruptcy stay, all deadlines and processes in this Court are suspended, and upon reinstatement, time lines will begin to run anew from the date of reinstatement. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. Thus, we may not and need not rule on appellant’s motion for extension of time, see id.; Continental Casing Corp. v. Samedan Oil Corp., 751 S.W.2d 499, 501 (Tex. 1988) (state court action during bankruptcy is void), and we abate the appeal while the bankruptcy stay is in place. Any party may file a motion to reinstate upon the occurrence of an event that would allow the appeal to proceed. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. Failure to notify this Court of a lift of the automatic stay or the conclusion of the bankruptcy proceeding will result in the dismissal of the case for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). __________________________________________ David Puryear, Justice Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Pemberton Bankruptcy Filed: November 19, 2008 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.