Victor Carr v. Greg Hamilton, County Sheriff and Rissie Owens, Board of Pardons and Paroles--Appeal from 419th District Court of Travis County

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00115-CV Victor Carr, Appellant v. Greg Hamilton, County Sheriff and Rissie Owens, Board of Pardons and Paroles, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 419TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-07-001980, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Victor Carr has failed to prosecute his appeal. Carr’s appellant’s brief was due May 5, 2008. By postcard dated June 16, 2008, this Court’s clerk’s office notified Carr that his brief was overdue and cautioned that his appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution unless Carr filed a motion reasonably explaining his failure to file a brief. That motion was due by June 26, 2008. On June 26, 2008, Carr filed a motion for extension of time to file his brief. The motion was marked received, but was not filed, by this Court’s clerk’s office because Carr did not pay the required filing fee and did not include a certificate that he had conferred with appellees. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 10.1(a)(5). Carr has not cured the deficiencies in his motion or filed a brief. By postcard dated June 26, 2008, this Court’s clerk directed Carr to file the certificate of conference and the filing fee by July 11, 2008. By letter dated August 5, 2008, this Court’s clerk reminded Carr that he had not paid the filing fee for his motion for extension or for the appeal itself. The clerk requested that Carr pay these fees by August 15, 2008. By letter dated September 2, 2008, the clerk reminded Carr that he had not paid the filing fee for his motion for extension, filed the certificate of conference for his motion for extension, or filed a brief. The clerk directed Carr to submit a proper motion for extension by September 15, 2008. The clerk cautioned that failure to file a proper motion would result in dismissal of this appeal. Carr has not paid the fees or filed the requested certificate of conference, a proper new motion, or a brief. We dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). G. Alan Waldrop, Justice Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: October 31, 2008 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.