Manuel Martinez v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 167th District Court of Travis County

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-07-00736-CR Manuel Martinez, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-DC-07-300124, HONORABLE MICHAEL LYNCH, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Manuel Martinez pleaded guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon by causing serious bodily injury, and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon by threatening serious bodily injury. The trial court assessed punishment at twenty years’ imprisonment and ten years’ imprisonment, respectively, with the sentences to run concurrently. Martinez’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he states that the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our review of the record, however, discloses an error that is not frivolous. Martinez was charged in a single indictment containing three counts—one count of aggravated assault and two counts of assault—with multiple paragraphs under each count. Martinez was convicted of aggravated assault under count one, paragraphs two and three, and again under count one, paragraph five. Because a count alleges a single offense, an indictment cannot authorize more convictions than there are counts, and there can be only one conviction per count. Martinez v. State, 225 S.W.3d 550, 554 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). This Court has previously held that a trial court erred by rendering judgments of conviction on more than one paragraph in a single count. See Fowler v. State, 240 S.W.3d 277, 281 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. ref’d). The appeal is abated. The trial court is instructed to appoint substitute counsel to file a brief discussing whether the trial court erred in rendering multiple judgments on a single count and any other issue that counsel deems meritorious. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Present counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. See id. A copy of the order appointing substitute counsel shall be forwarded to this Court no later than November 10, 2008. Substitute counsel’s brief will be due thirty days after the date of appointment. __________________________________________ Diane M. Henson, Justice Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson Abated Filed: October 30, 2008 Do Not Publish 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.