Heldy Finch v. James Arthur Finch--Appeal from 395th District Court of Williamson County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00114-CV Heldy Finch, Appellant v. James Arthur Finch, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 395TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 01-324-F395, HONORABLE MICHAEL JERGINS, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION The brief of appellant Heldy Finch was due May 8, 2003. By letter of May 22, 2003, appellant was notified that her brief was overdue and instructed to tender a brief with the explanation required by Rule 38 or her appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1) (if appellant fails timely to file brief, appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution unless appellant reasonably explains failure and appellee not significantly injured). To date, we have received no response. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b) (dismissal for want of prosecution). W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: August 14, 2003 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
