Julian S. Crowell; Lometta Wann; Jean Wann Edwards; Cynthia McIntire; Lois H. Crowell; Clinton McIntire; Rosamond C. Berry; Michael Clifton Allen; and Dorothy Allen Tidewater v. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission; George Ralph Roming in his official capacity; George Crump in his official capacity; City of Stephenville; City of Glen Rose; and Somervell County--Appeal from 98th District Court of Travis County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-02-00300-CV Julian S. Crowell; Lometa Wann; Jean Wann Edwards; Cynthia McIntire; Lois H. Crowell; Clinton McIntire; Rosamond C. Berry; Michael Clifton Allen; and Dorothy Allen Tidewater, Appellants v. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission; George Ralph Roming in his official capacity; George Crumpin his official capacity; City of Stephenville; City of Glen Rose; and Somerville County, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 432,066-A, HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING On June 6, 2002, appellants filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal, which complains of the district court=s order granting the pleas to the jurisdiction of appellees, the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, 1 George Ralph Roming, George R. Crump, City of Stephenville, City of Glen Rose, and Somerville County. The appellants have informed this Court 1 This appeal involves a dispute over the application for a permit to construct a dam and reservoir on the Paluxy River. In 1987, at the time of the application for the permit, appellants were required to submit the application to the Texas Water Commission, which is now known as the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. that they no longer desire to prosecute this appeal. Accordingly, we will grant appellants= motion and dismiss this appeal. Lee Yeakel, Justice Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel Dismissed on Appellants= Motion Filed: June 27, 2002 Do Not Publish 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
