ACandS, Inc. v. Dorothy A. Lehmann, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Heirs and Estate of Clarence R. Lehmann, Deceased; Alan Sweeten; Eugene Kanak; James Jones; James Scott; and Henry Taylor--Appeal from 20th District Court of Milam County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-01-00543-CV ACandS, Inc., Appellant v. Dorothy A. Lehmann, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Heirs and Estate of Clarence R. Lehmann, Deceased; Alan Sweeten; Eugene Kanak; James Jones; James Scott; and Henry Taylor, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY, 20th JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 26,342, HONORABLE ED MAGRE, JUDGE PRESIDING The parties have filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Want of Finality and we grant their joint motion and dismiss for want of jurisdiction. The parties allege that the judgment in the underlying matter was intended to be entered in Cause No. 26,342-A, a cause severed from the original lawsuit for purposes of trial. The original lawsuit was filed under Cause No. 26,342. Judgment in the severed cause (Cause No. 26,342-A) was mistakenly signed and entered under Cause No. 26,342. There remain in the original lawsuit other issues and parties pending before the court so that the judgment rendered under Cause No. 26,342 is interlocutory and unappealable. The parties request that this appeal (from Cause No. 26,342) be dismissed for want of finality. The parties represent to this Court that they will jointly move the district court to set aside the current judgment in Cause No. 26,342 and to rendered judgment in Cause No. 26,342-A, after which appellant AcandS, Inc. will perfect a new appeal from the final judgment entered in Cause No. 26,342-A. It appears to this Court that the parties request is well-taken. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Lee Yeakel, Justice Before: Justices Kidd, Yeakel and Patterson Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: December 20, 2001 Do Not Publish 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
