Jason Gordon v. The State of Texas--Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 of Williamson County

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-96-00112-CR
Jason Gordon, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
NO. 94-2560-1, HONORABLE WILLIAM S. LOTT, JUDGE PRESIDING

PER CURIAM

 

The county court at law found appellant guilty of possessing marihuana. Controlled Substances Act, 71st Leg., R.S., ch. 678, sec. 1, 481.121, 1989 Tex. Gen. Laws 2230, 2939 (Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. 481.121, since amended). The court assessed punishment at incarceration for 180 days and a $1000 fine, but suspended imposition of sentence and placed appellant on community supervision.

Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief in which he concludes that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

 

Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Aboussie and Kidd

Affirmed

Filed: August 14, 1996

Do Not Publish