Makorey Pegues v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 331st District Court of Travis County

Annotate this Case
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-94-00536-CR
AND
NO. 03-94-00537-CR
Makorey Pegues, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NOS. 0941161 & 0941162, HONORABLE LARRY FULLER, JUDGE PRESIDING

PER CURIAM

 

After accepting appellant's pleas of guilty and hearing his judicial confessions, the district court in each cause found appellant guilty of aggravated sexual assault. Act of May 26, 1987, 70th Leg., R.S., ch. 573, 1, 1987 Tex. Gen. Laws 2275, amended by Act of July 18, 1987, 70th Leg., 2d C.S., ch. 16, 1, 1987 Tex. Gen. Laws 80 (Tex. Penal Code Ann. 22.021, since amended). The court assessed punishment in each cause at imprisonment for forty-five years.

Appellant's court-appointed attorneys filed a brief in which they conclude that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). A copy of counsels' brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsels' brief and agree that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals.

The judgments of conviction are affirmed.

 

Before Justices Powers, Kidd and B. A. Smith

Affirmed on Both Causes

Filed: March 8, 1995

Do Not Publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.