J. Prudencio Rodriguez-Izquierdo v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 27th District Court of Bell County
Annotate this CaseAT AUSTIN
NO. 3-92-368-CR
J. PRUDENCIO RODRIGUEZ-IZQUIERDO,
APPELLANT
vs.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
APPELLEE
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 41,270, HONORABLE JACK W. PRESCOTT, JUDGE
PER CURIAM
This is an appeal from a conviction for attempted murder. Punishment was assessed at confinement for 5 years.
Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. No decision of this Court has been delivered. The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. Ann. 59(b) (Pamph. 1992).
[Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Jones and Kidd]
Dismissed On Appellant's Motion
Filed: October 7, 1992
[Do Not Publish]
October 7, 1992
Mr. Stephen E. Blythe
Tarver, Bachus & Blythe
P. O. Box 2088
Temple, Texas 76501
Honorable James T. Russell
Administrative Assistant
Bell County Courthouse
P. O. Box 540
Belton, Texas 76513
Re: No. 3-92-368-CR--J. Prudencio Rodriguez-Izquierdo v. The State of Texas
(t/c no. 41,270)
Counsel:
In accordance with Rule 91, Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, enclosed is a copy of the opinion and judgment handed down by this Court on this date in the above cause.
The Court's mandate has been issued this date to the clerk of the trial court under separate cover.
Very truly yours,
W. KENNETH LAW, CLERK
By
Barbara E. Chapman, Deputy
Enclosures
xc: State Prosecuting Attorney
Clerk, Court of Criminal Appeals
Honorable Jack W. Prescott, District Judge
Mrs. Daffy Carpenter, District Clerk
TRIAL COURT NO. 41,270THE STATE OF TEXAS.
TO THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT of BELL COUNTY - GREETINGS:
Before our COURT OF APPEALS, on the 7th of October A.D. 1992, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment between
J. PRUDENCIO RODRIGUEZ-IZQUIERDO, Appellant,
No. 3-92-368-CR vs.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee,
was determined; and therein our said COURT OF APPEALS made its orders in these words:
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the written motion of the appellant to dismiss the appeal and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that the same should be granted: it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the Court that appellant be allowed to withdraw notice of appeal and that the appeal be dismissed; that the appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
WHEREFORE, We command you to observe the order of said COURT OF APPEALS in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed and executed.
WITNESS the HONORABLE JIMMY CARROLL, Chief Justice of our said COURT OF APPEALS for the Third District of Texas, with the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Austin, this the 7th day of October A.D. 1992.
W. KENNETH LAW, CLERK
by: , Deputy
Barbara E. Chapman
October 7, 1992
Mrs. Daffy Carpenter
District Clerk
Bell County Courthouse
104 S. Main
Belton, Texas 76513
Re: No. 3-92-368-CR--J. Prudencio Rodriguez-
Izquierdo v. State of Texas
(t/c no. 41,270)
Dear Mrs. Carpenter:
Enclosed, with reference to the above cause, is the mandate of this Court. Please acknowledge your receipt of same by returning the enclosed card (No. 1) to this office, appropriately completed.
Rule 87(b), Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, sets out the procedures to be followed upon your receipt of the mandate.
Upon execution of the mandate in accordance with the rule, either your office or the sheriff's office should return the remaining card enclosed (No. 2), appropriately completed.
Your cooperation in this regard is appreciated.
Very truly yours,
W. KENNETH LAW, CLERK
by
Barbara E. Chapman, Deputy
Enclosures to Clerk
xc: Mr. Stephen E. Blythe
Honorable James T. Russell
MR. STEPHEN E. BLYTHE
TARVER, BACHUS & BLYTHE
P. O. BOX 2088
TEMPLE TX 76501
HONORABLE JAMES T. RUSSELL
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
BELL COUNTY COURTHOUSE
P. O. BOX 540
BELTON TX 76513
MRS. DAFFY CARPENTER
DISTRICT CLERK
BELL COUNTY COURTHOUSE
104 S. MAIN
BELTON TX 76513
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.