Kelly Hunka v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 167th District Court of Travis County

Annotate this Case
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS,
AT AUSTIN
NO. 3-90-245-CR
KELLY HUNKA,

APPELLANT

 
vs.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

 
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 101,185, HONORABLE BOB JONES, JUDGE

PER CURIAM

 

This is an appeal from a conviction for drug possession. Punishment was assessed at confinement for 10 years and a $2000 fine, probated.

Appellant has filed a motion to withdraw the appeal. No decision of this Court has been delivered. The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. Ann. 59(b) (Pamph. 1991).

 

[Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Aboussie and Kidd]

Dismissed On Appellant's Motion

Filed: September 11, 1991

[Do Not Publish]

 
September 11, 1991

Mr. Larry J. Dowling

Dowling & Wilson, P.C.

2003 North Lamar

Austin, Texas 78705

 

Honorable Ronald Earle

District Attorney

Travis County Courthouse

P. O. Box 1748

Austin, Texas 78767

 

Re: No. 3-90-245-CR--Kelly Hunka v. The State of Texas (t/c no. 101,185)

 

Counsel:

 

You are hereby notified that appellant's motion to dismiss appeal in the above cause was this day submitted and granted. The appeal is dismissed on appellant's motion.

 

A copy of this Court's opinion and judgment are enclosed in accordance with Rule 91, Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

 

The Court's mandate has been issued this date to the clerk of the trial court under separate cover.

 

Very truly yours,

 

SUSAN K. BAGE, CLERK

 

By

Barbara E. Chapman, Deputy

Enclosures

 

xc: State Prosecuting Attorney

Clerk, Court of Criminal Appeals

Honorable Bob Jones, District Judge

Ms. Amalia Rodriguez-Mendoza, District Clerk

MR. LARRY J. DOWLING

DOWLING & WILSON, P.C.

2003 NORTH LAMAR

AUSTIN, TX 78705

HONORABLE RONALD EARLE

DISTRICT ATTORNEY

TRAVIS COUNTY COURTHOUSE

P. O. BOX 1748

AUSTIN, TX 78767

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.