Richard Russell Wood and Watermark Industries, LLC (previously d/b/a Mr. Appliance of Daytona Beach) v. Mr. Appliance LLC Appeal from 414th District Court of McLennan County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-20-00246-CV RICHARD RUSSELL WOOD AND WATERMARK INDUSTRIES, LLC (PREVIOUSLY D/B/A MR. APPLIANCE OF DAYTONA BEACH), Appellants v. MR. APPLIANCE LLC, Appellee From the 414th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019-712-5 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Richard Russell Wood filed a pro se notice of appeal in this Court on September 21, 2020. Wood appealed on his own behalf and on behalf of Watermark Industries, LLC (previously d/b/a Mr. Appliance of Daytona Beach). After being informed by the Court that he could not represent Watermark Industries unless he was an attorney, Wood voluntarily dismissed Watermark Industries from this appeal on November 23, 2020 in his amended notice of appeal. The docketing statement was not received. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1. On June 7, 2021, we sent a letter explaining that the docketing statement must be filed and warning that the Court could dismiss the appeal if a docketing statement was not filed within ten (10) days. See id. at R. 42.3(c). More than ten days have passed, and we have not received the docketing statement. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See id. at R. 32.1, 42.3(c); see also Cornett v. Williams, No. 10-19-00141-CV, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 4851, at *1 (Tex. App.—Waco June 12, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing case for failure to file docketing statement). MATT JOHNSON Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Davis1 Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed July 14, 2021 [CV06] 1 The Honorable Rex Davis, Senior Justice (Retired) of the Tenth Court of Appeals sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003. Wood v. Mr. Appliance LLC Page 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
