Charles Joshua Raines v. The State of Texas Appeal from 85th District Court of Brazos County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-20-00167-CR No. 10-20-00168-CR No. 10-20-00169-CR No. 10-20-00170-CR No. 10-20-00171-CR No. 10-20-00172-CR CHARLES JOSHUA RAINES, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant Appellee From the 85th District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 13-05345-CRM-85; 15-04964-CRM-85; 16-04795-CRM-85; 16-04629-CRM85; 16-04759-CRM-85; and 19-03987-CRF-85 MEMORANDUM OPINION Charles Raines attempts to appeal the trial court’s order withdrawing its grant of Raines’s motion for speedy trial in each of his six criminal cases. Raines has not yet been convicted in any of these cases; thus, these appeals are interlocutory. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a) (notice of appeal due within specified time period after sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or after trial court enters appealable order). The law is clear in Texas that we have no jurisdiction of an interlocutory appeal of the denial of a motion for speedy trial. See Ex parte Delbert, 582 S.W.2d 145, 146 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1979) (citing Ordunez v. Bean, 579 S.W.2d 911 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979)); see United States v. MacDonald, 435 U.S. 850, 862, 98 S. Ct. 1547, 56 L. Ed. 2d 18 (1978) ("Allowing an exception to the rule against pretrial appeals in criminal cases for speedy trial claims would threaten precisely the values manifested in the Speedy Trial Clause."). It follows, then, that we have no jurisdiction of an interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s decision to withdraw an order granting a motion for speedy trial. A court has jurisdiction over criminal appeals only when expressly granted by law. See Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696-97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (standard for determining jurisdiction is not whether appeal is precluded by law, but whether appeal is authorized by law); Everett v. State, 91 S.W.3d 386, 386 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.). No law authorizes the interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s order. Accordingly, we have no jurisdiction of these appeals and they are dismissed. TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Appeals dismissed Opinion delivered and filed July 9, 2020 Do not publish [CR25] Raines v. State Page 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
