In re Shane Mix Appeal from ... of ... County (opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-19-00438-CR IN RE SHANE MIX Original Proceeding OPINION Shane Mix, a jail inmate, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to rule on the relief requested by Mix in an application for writ of habeas corpus filed on November 7, 2019. Mix alleges that the habeas application was read to the trial court in open court on November 8, 2019 and that the trial court has not ruled on the application. We asked for a response on December 9, 2019 from the Respondent or the RealParty-in-Interest. In the request, we stated that if the application for writ of habeas corpus had been ruled on, a copy of the ruling would suffice in place of a response. To this date, no response or copy of the ruling has been filed. This is not like cases where the trial court does not know about the document requesting relief. In this case, it appears the habeas application was read to the trial court in open court more than 60 days ago. No reason has been given for the delay in ruling on the application or for a need for further consideration. Accordingly, we conditionally grant the requested writ of mandamus. We are confident that the Respondent will promptly consider and rule on Mix’s application for writ of habeas corpus filed on November 7, 2019. The writ will issue only if the Respondent fails to advise this Court within thirty days of the date of this opinion that he has ruled on the application. TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Pet. conditionally granted Opinion delivered and filed January 22, 2020 Publish [OT06] In re Mix Page 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
