Mary Herzog Franks v. Dillan Lee Thibodeaux and Valsource International Appeal from County Court at Law of Walker County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-19-00267-CV MARY HERZOG FRANKS, Appellant v. DILLAN LEE THIBODEAUX AND VALSOURCE INTERNATIONAL, Appellees From the County Court at Law Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 12760CV MEMORANDUM OPINION On August 12, 2019, appellant, Mary Herzog Franks, filed her notice of appeal in this matter. The Clerk’s and Reporter’s Records were filed on September 9, 2019, and October 3, 2019, respectively. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a), appellant’s brief was due within thirty days of October 3, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellant filed multiple motions for extension of time to file her appellant’s brief in this case. We granted each of appellant’s motions for extension of time. The latest motion for extension of time filed by appellant indicated a requested due date of January 3, 2020. When appellant did not file her appellant’s brief by January 3, 2020, we sent a letter, on January 10, 2020, informing appellant that her brief was late. Furthermore, in our January 10, 2020 letter, we warned appellant that this case may be dismissed for want of prosecution unless, within twenty-one days of January 10, 2020, she filed with this court a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. More than twenty-one days have passed, and appellant has not responded to our January 10, 2020 letter showing grounds for continuing the appeal. As such, we hereby dismiss this appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c). 1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). JOHN E. NEILL Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed February 12, 2020 [CV06] 1 And in light of our disposition, all pending motions are dismissed as moot. Franks v. Thibodeaux, et al. Page 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.