In re Christopher Roland Fenner Appeal from 18th District Court of Somervell County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-19-00002-CR IN RE CHRISTOPHER ROLAND FENNER Original Proceeding MEMORANDUM OPINION As part of a plea bargain, Christopher Roland Fenner was convicted of aggravated sexual assault and sentenced to 5 years in prison; and, after initially being placed on deferred adjudication community supervision, he was later adjudicated guilty of indecency with a child and sentenced to 20 years in prison. Acting pro se, he requests a mandamus from this Court alleging constitutional violations in the trial court regarding those same convictions. Fenner is represented by counsel in an appeal pending in this Court to review his indecency conviction. And notwithstanding that his plea and sentence was part of a plea agreement and he waived his right to appeal, the time in which to appeal his conviction for aggravated sexual assault has long since expired. Additionally, based upon the content of his petition for writ of mandamus, Fenner appears to be asserting some type of double jeopardy violation. His specific complaint, however, is difficult to ascertain. It is difficult to even determine in which of his cases the complaint is raised or what trial court action he asserts is properly reviewed in this type of proceeding. Moreover, there are procedural problems with Fenner’s petition, including that it does not appear the petition has been served on the State as the real party in interest. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5; 52.2. He also did not provide any record. Id. 52.7. We use Rule 2, however, to look beyond these deficiencies to reach an expeditious result. TEX. R. APP. P. 2. Fenner’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Petition denied Opinion delivered and filed January 9, 2019 [OT06] In re Fenner Page 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
