In the Interest of C.Z.C. and N.M.C., Children Appeal from 413th District Court of Johnson County (memorandum opinion by chief justice gray)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-15-00448-CV IN THE INTEREST OF C.Z.C. AND N.M.C., CHILDREN From the 413th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No. D201206298 MEMORANDUM OPINION A notice of appeal by Christopher L. Cogdill regarding the associate judge’s proposed Order Enforcing Child Support and Medical Support Obligation signed on December 15, 2015 and adopted by the trial court judge on December 17, 2015 was forwarded to this Court by the District Clerk and set up as a new appeal on the Court’s docket. Cogdill has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, stating that he intended a review by the 413th District Court of the associate judge’s proposed order. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 201.015 (a) (West 2014) (“A party may request a de novo hearing before the referring court by filing with the clerk of the referring court a written request….”). Cogdill asserts that the clerk mistakenly sent the notice of appeal to this Court. We agree. Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to TEX. R. APP. P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See also TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 5; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207(b); 51.208; § 51.941(a) (West 2013). Under these circumstances, we find the rule is not applicable and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case and to waive the payment and collection thereof. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2. Cogdill’s motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed January 7, 2016 [CV06] In the Interest of C.Z.C. and N.M.C. Page 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
