In re Marshall S. Hicks Appeal from 413th District Court of Johnson County (memorandum opinion by chief justice gray)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-14-00343-CR IN RE MARSHALL S. HICKS Original Proceeding MEMORANDUM OPINION Marshall Shane Hicks was convicted in 2010 of indecency with a child. His original appeal of that conviction was transferred from this Court to the Thirteenth Court of Appeals (Corpus Christi). That appeal was dismissed because the conviction was based on a plea bargain and Hicks had no right to appeal. On October 30, 2014, Hicks filed a document entitled “Motion for Judgment to Correct Clerical Mistake (Nunc Pro Tunc)” as an original proceeding requesting relief directly from this Court. The purpose of a nunc pro tunc judgment is to provide a method for trial courts to make a correction when there is a discrepancy between the judgment as pronounced in court and the written judgment reflected in the record. Blanton v. State, 369 S.W.3d 894, 897-898 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). By this proceeding, Hicks has asked this Court to correct the opinion and judgment by the Thirteenth Court of Appeals. We have no jurisdiction over the opinions or judgments of other courts of appeals. See TEX. CONST. ART. V, § 6(a). Accordingly, this proceeding is dismissed. TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed November 20, 2014 Do not publish [OT06] In re Hicks Page 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
