Manuel Luz Aleman v. The State of Texas Appeal from 54th District Court of McLennan County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-14-00126-CR MANUEL LUZ ALEMAN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013-1252-C2 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Manuel Luz Aleman entered an open plea of guilty to the offense of possession of a controlled substance, namely, cocaine, in an amount of one gram or more, but less than four grams. A jury assessed his punishment, enhanced by a prior felony conviction, at twelve years imprisonment. Aleman appealed. Aleman s appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although informed of his right to do so, Aleman did not file a pro se response to the Anders brief. In an Anders case, we must, after a full examination of all the proceedings, ¦ decide whether the case is wholly frivolous. Id. at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; accord Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is wholly frivolous or without merit when it lacks any basis in law or fact. McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 439 n.10, 108 S.Ct. 1895, 1902 n.10, 100 L.Ed.2d 440 (1988). We have conducted an independent review of the record, and because we find this appeal to be wholly frivolous, we affirm the judgment. We grant appointed counsel s motion to withdraw from representation of Aleman. Notwithstanding this grant, appointed counsel must send Aleman a copy of our decision, notify him of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review, and send this Court a letter certifying counsel s compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 48.4. TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4; see also Ex parte Owens, 206 S.W.3d 670, 673-74 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Affirmed Opinion delivered and filed October 16, 2014 Do not publish [CR25] Aleman v. State Page 2 Aleman v. State Page 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
