William Patrick Alexander v. Lisa M. Birnel, Ronald Fox, Edward Smith, Willis W. Owens, III, John E. Ritter, Gilbert Campuzano, and Bruce ArmstrongAppeal from 52nd District Court of Coryell County (memorandum opinion by chief justice gray)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-13-00336-CV WILLIAM PATRICK ALEXANDER, Appellant v. LISA M. BIRNEL, RONALD FOX, EDWARD SMITH, WILLIS W. OWENS, III, JOHN E. RITTER, GILBERT CAMPUZANO, AND BRUCE ARMSTRONG, Appellees From the 52nd District Court Coryell County, Texas Trial Court No. COT-11-40924 MEMORANDUM OPINION William P. Alexander, a prison inmate, attempts to appeal from the trial court s order granting summary judgment in favor of six of eight defendants sued by Alexander. By letter dated October 31, 2013, the Clerk of this Court notified Alexander that the appeal was subject to dismissal because it appeared that the order which is the subject of the appeal is not a final, appealable order because it does not dispose of all parties and claims. By the same letter, the Clerk also warned Alexander that the Court would dismiss the appeal unless, within 10 days from the date of the letter, a response was filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal. A response was filed on November 12, 2013 but it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal. Alexander argues in his response that Rule 58(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows him to appeal an order that does not dispose of all parties and claims. The federal rules do not apply to Texas state courts of appeal. As a general rule in Texas, an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). An order or judgment is final when it disposes of all parties and claims. Id. at 205. The order Alexander attempts to appeal does not dispose of his claims against two defendants, Lisa M. Birnel and Ronald C. Fox. Accordingly, the trial court's order, signed on September 11, 2013, is not final, and Alexander may not appeal that order at this time. This appeal is dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).1 TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed November 21, 2013 [CV06] A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment or order of this Court is rendered. TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the decision of this Court reviewed by the Texas Supreme Court, a petition for review must be filed with the Texas Supreme Court clerk within 45 days after either the date the court of appeals judgment was rendered or the date the last ruling on all timely motions for rehearing was made by the court of appeals. TEX. R. APP. P. 53.7(a). 1 Alexander v. Birnel Page 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.