Larry Dewayne Lee, Jr. v. The State of TexasAppeal from County Court at Law No 2 of Brazos County (memorandum opinion )

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-13-00178-CR LARRY DEWAYNE LEE, JR., Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the County Court at Law No 2 Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 11-00126-CRM-CCL2 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Larry Dewayne Lee, Jr., appeals from an order deferring adjudication of his guilt and placing him on community supervision. The trial court s certification of Lee s right to appeal states that this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right to appeal and that the defendant has waived the right of appeal. By letter dated June 12, 2013, the Clerk of this Court warned Lee that the Court must dismiss this appeal unless, within thirty days after the date of the letter, the Court received a certification stating that Lee has a right to appeal or he showed other grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). On July 3, 2013, we received a response from Lee, but we have not been provided with a certification stating that Lee has a right to appeal, nor did Lee show other grounds for continuing the appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.1 See Chavez, 183 S.W.3d at 680; Davis v. State, 205 S.W.3d 606, 607 (Tex. App. Waco 2006, no pet.). REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed July 12, 2013 Do not publish [CR25] A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment or order of this Court is rendered. TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. A petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within 30 days after either the day the court of appeals judgment was rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing was overruled by the court of appeals. TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2(a). 1 Lee v. State Page 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.