LeDouglas G. Johnson, Surety, and Amanda R. Johnson, Surety v. The State of TexasAppeal from County Court at Law of Ellis County (memorandum opinion )

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-13-00036-CR No. 10-13-00037-CR LEDOUGLAS G. JOHNSON, SURETY, AND AMANDA R. JOHNSON, SURETY, Appellants v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the County Court at Law Ellis County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 12-C-3258 and 12-C-3259 MEMORANDUM OPINION The Clerk of this Court notified Appellants, LeDouglas G. Johnson, Surety and Amanda R. Johnson, Surety by letter dated March 13, 2013, that the clerk s record in the above cause had apparently not been filed because Appellants had failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk s fee for preparation of the record. Appellants were further notified that if they desired to proceed with this appeal, they must pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk s fee and notify this Court of the actions taken within 21 days after the date of this letter. Appellants were warned that if they failed to do so, this appeal might be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P 37.3(b). Appellants did not file a response. The Clerk of this Court again notified Appellants by letter dated April 15, 2013, that the clerk s record had not been filed. Appellants were notified that if they desired to proceed with the appeal, they must pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk s fee for the preparation of the record. Appellants were warned that if they failed to do so, this appeal might be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P 37.3(b). More than 21 days have passed, and we have not been notified that Appellants have paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk s fee. Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b). AL SCOGGINS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed May 30, 2013 [CR25] Johnson v. State Page 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.