Bobby Ray Snell, Jr. v. The State of TexasAppeal from 19th District Court of McLennan County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-12-00368-CR BOBBY RAY SNELL, JR., Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011-2478-C1 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Bobby Ray Snell, Jr., entered an open plea of guilty to the seconddegree-felony offense of possession of a controlled substance (codeine). The trial court assessed Snell s punishment, enhanced by a prior felony conviction, at twenty-five years confinement. Snell appealed. In one issue, Snell contends that although his punishment range was enhanced from that of a second-degree felony to that of a firstdegree felony, the degree of the offense was not enhanced; therefore, the judgment should be modified accordingly. After Snell filed his brief, the trial court signed a judgment nunc pro tunc, modifying the Degree of Offense from 1ST DEGREE FELONY to 2ND DEGREE FELONY. The State then filed a letter brief, stating that the judgment nunc pro tunc mooted Snell s only issue and that, even if the issue were not moot, the State would concede error. Appellate courts are prohibited from deciding moot controversies. See Ex parte Flores, 130 S.W.3d 100, 104-05 (Tex. App. El Paso 2003, no pet.). A case becomes moot on appeal when the judgment of the appellate court can no longer have an effect on an existing controversy or cannot affect the rights of the parties. Jack v. State, 149 S.W.3d 119, 123 n.10 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). We agree with the State that the judgment nunc pro tunc mooted Snell s only issue. By letter dated February 27, 2013, the Clerk of this Court notified Snell that this appeal was subject to dismissal because the trial court s nunc pro tunc judgment mooted his sole issue on appeal. The Clerk also warned Snell that the Court may dismiss the appeal unless, within twenty-one days of the date of the letter, a response was filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal. No response has been received from Snell. Accordingly, his appeal is dismissed. REX D. DAVIS Justice Snell v. State Page 2 Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed April 11, 2013 Do not publish [CRPM] Snell v. State Page 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
