Benjamin Alan Morrison v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 19th District Court of McLennan County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11-00157-CR BENJAMIN ALAN MORRISON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010-997-C1 MEMORANDUM OPINION Benjamin Alan Morrison, pro se, appeals from his plea-bargained felony convictions. The Clerk warned Morrison that the Court would dismiss his appeal because his notice of appeal was not timely filed unless, within 21 days, a response was filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal. The Clerk also warned Morrison that because the trial court noted on the certification of defendant s right of appeal that he had no right of appeal and Morrison had signed a waiver of his right to appeal, the Court would dismiss the appeal unless, within 21 days, we received a certification stating that Morrison has a right to appeal or a response was filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Morrison has not responded. The date sentence was imposed was March 21, 2011. Morrison s notice of appeal was filed on May 4, 2011 and was thus untimely. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1) (providing that notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after date sentence imposed or 30 days after entry of appealable order). Because Morrison s notice of appeal is untimely, we lack jurisdiction. Furthermore, there is no certification that permits Morrison to appeal, and he waived his right to appeal. See Chavez, 183 S.W.3d at 680; Davis v. State, 205 S.W.3d 606, 607 (Tex. App. Waco 2006, no pet.). We dismiss the appeal. Morrison s motion to recuse the District Attorney is dismissed as moot. REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed; motion dismissed as moot Opinion delivered and filed June 29, 2011 Do not publish [CRPM] Morrison v. State Page 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
