Heliodoro Camejo v. The State of Texas--Appeal from County Court of Bosque County (majority)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11-00265-CR HELIODORO CAMEJO, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the County Court Bosque County, Texas Trial Court No. 18368 MEMORANDUM OPINION Heliodoro Camejo, who is pro se and not indigent, is appealing a county-court conviction for speeding, according to his document entitled statement of facts, which we have initially treated as a notice of appeal. Since the filing of this putative appeal, Camejo has had no contact with this Court. Camejo has not responded to this Court s letter requesting him to clarify if he is appealing to this Court. Camejo also has not filed the docketing statement, despite our letter directing him to do so. Most importantly, the clerk s record has not been filed because Camejo has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk s fee for preparation of the record (he also has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the reporter s fee for preparation of the reporter s record), and we notified Camejo that we might dismiss this case for want of prosecution for this failure. Camejo has completely failed in his duty to prosecute this appeal, to contact this Court, and to take any further action toward prosecuting this appeal. We conclude that Camejo does not desire to prosecute this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal, under our inherent authority, for want of prosecution. See Peralta v. State, 82 S.W.3d 724, 725 (Tex. App. Waco 2002, no pet.). REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed October 19, 2011 Do not publish [CR25] Camejo v. State Page 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
