Kristi Deanna Lattig a/k/a Kristi Dianna Saunders v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 220th District Court of Bosque County (majority)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11-00077-CR KRISTI DEANNA LATTIG A/K/A KRISTI DIANNA SAUNDERS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 220th District Court Bosque County, Texas Trial Court No. 09-02-14320-BCCR MEMORANDUM OPINION Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, Kristi Deanna Lattig1 pleaded guilty to the offense of possession of methamphetamine and was placed on deferred adjudication community supervision for five years. The State filed a motion to adjudicate guilt alleging nine violations of the conditions of community supervision. The trial court held a hearing on the motion to adjudicate, and Lattig entered a plea of true to each of the alleged violations. After hearing punishment evidence, the trial court adjudicated 1 Kristi Deanna Lattig is also known as Kristi Deanna Saunders. Lattig s guilt and assessed her punishment at confinement for eighteen months in a state jail facility and a $730 fine. We affirm. In her sole issue on appeal, Lattig argues that she received ineffective assistance of counsel. To determine if trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance, we must first determine whether Lattig has shown that counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and, if so, then determine whether there is a reasonable probability that the result would have been different but for counsel's errors. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, (1984). We must indulge a strong presumption that counsel's conduct fell within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance, and Lattig must overcome the presumption that, under the circumstances, the challenged action might be considered sound trial strategy. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 508-09 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An allegation of ineffective assistance must be firmly founded in the record, and the record must affirmatively demonstrate the alleged ineffectiveness. Thompson v. State, 9 S.W.3d 808, 814 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). Lattig argues that her trial counsel was ineffective in advising her to plead true to each of the allegations in the motion to adjudicate. Lattig contends she substantially complied with the community supervision conditions or had legitimate defenses to eight of the nine alleged violations. Lattig acknowledges that she had a urine sample that tested positive for the presence of cocaine as set out in Violation #1 of the State s motion to adjudicate. Lattig pleaded true to the allegations and then offered mitigating evidence for the trial court to consider in assessing punishment. Lattig testified that she was asking Lattig v. State Page 2 the trial court to reinstate her community supervision. She offered explanations for the violations. Lattig testified that she had been clean since the violation and offered to submit to frequent drug testing. Viewing the record before us, we cannot say that trial counsel s representation was not based upon sound trial strategy. Lattig has not overcome the strong presumption that counsel s conduct fell within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance. We overrule Lattig s sole issue on appeal. We affirm the trial court s judgment. AL SCOGGINS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Affirm Opinion delivered and filed October 12, 2011 Do not publish [CR25] Lattig v. State Page 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
