Charles William Self v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 77th District Court of Limestone County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-09-00034-CR CHARLES WILLIAM SELF, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 77th District Court Limestone County, Texas Trial Court No. 11513-A MEMORANDUM OPINION Charles William Self pled guilty to the first-degree felony offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child, and after a punishment hearing, was sentenced by the trial court to forty years in prison. Self s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief, asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although informed of his right to do so, Self did not file a pro se brief or response. The State did not file a brief. We will affirm. In an Anders case, we must, after a full examination of all the proceedings, [] decide whether the case is wholly frivolous. Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; accord Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is wholly frivolous or without merit when it lacks any basis in law or fact. McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 439 n.10, 108 S.Ct. 1895, 1902 n.10, 100 L.Ed.2d 440 (1988). We have conducted an independent review of the record, and because we find this appeal to be wholly frivolous, we affirm the judgment. Counsel must send Self a copy of our decision by certified mail, return receipt requested, at Self s last known address. TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4. Counsel must also notify Self of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Id.; see also Ex parte Owens, 206 S.W.3d 670, 673-74 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We grant counsel s motion to withdraw, effective upon counsel s compliance with the aforementioned notification requirement as evidenced by a letter [to this Court] certifying his compliance. See TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4. REX D. DAVIS Justice Self v. State Page 2 Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Reyna, and Justice Davis (Chief Justice Gray concurs in the judgment to the extent it affirms the trial court s judgment only. A separate opinion will not issue.) Affirmed Opinion delivered and filed December 8, 2010 Do not publish [CRPM] Self v. State Page 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
