Flying Diamond-West Madisonville Limited Partnership, Sol Levine, and Mardan Energy Corporation v. GW Petroleum, Inc., Great Western Onshore, Inc., Forcenergy Onshore, Inc., Cascade Energy Corporation, Faulconer 1996 LLC, Gulfwest Oil Company, and Gulfwest Oil & Gas Company--Appeal from 278th District Court of Madison County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-07-00281-CV FLYING DIAMOND-WEST MADISONVILLE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, SOL LEVINE, AND MARDAN ENERGY CORPORATION, Appellants v. GW PETROLEUM, INC., GREAT WESTERN ONSHORE, INC., FORCENERGY ONSHORE, INC., CASCADE ENERGY CORPORATION, FAULCONER 1996 LLC, GULFWEST OIL COMPANY, AND GULFWEST OIL & GAS COMPANY, Appellees From the 278th District Court Madison County, Texas Trial Court No. 6354 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellants, Flying Diamond-West Madisonville Limited Partnership, Sol Levine, and Mardan Energy Corporation filed a notice of appeal on September 13, 2007. This Court issued its opinion and judgment affirming in part and reversing in part on August 26, 2009. A motion for rehearing was filed on September 11, 2009. This Court referred this cause to mediation on October 7, 2009. Appellants and Appellees now jointly seek a dismissal of this appeal because the parties have settled their dispute in mediation and they no longer wish to pursue the appeal. The parties have agreed that the costs of appeal should be borne by the party incurring them. Therefore, we withdraw the prior judgment entered in this cause dated August 26, 2009. The opinion of the Court issued on August 26, 2009 is not withdrawn. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed and the court costs are assessed against the party incurring them. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1. The motion for rehearing is denied as moot. TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Reyna, and Justice Davis Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed April 14, 2010 [CV06] Flying Diamond-West Madisonville Ltd. Partnership v. GW Petroleum, Inc. Page 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
