Maxin Burhan Obeidat v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 18th District Court of Johnson County

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-04-00363-CR

Maxin Burhan Obeidat,

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas,

Appellee

From the 18th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. F37717

MEMORANDUM Opinion

Obeidat appeals his conviction for first-degree-felony possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. 481.112(d) (Vernon 2003); see also id. 481.102(6) (Vernon Supp. 2004-2005). We affirm.

In Obeidat s one issue, he contends that the trial court erred in admitting evidence. The State argues that Obeidat forfeited the issue by filing to complain at trial.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure require: As a prerequisite to presenting a complaint for appellate review, the record must show that . . . the complaint was made to the trial court by a timely request, objection or motion . . . . Tex. R. App. P. 33.1(a). Except for complaints involving systemic (or absolute) requirements, or rights that are waivable only, which are not involved here, all other complaints, whether constitutional, statutory, or otherwise, are forfeited by failure to comply with Rule 33.1(a). Mendez v. State, 138 S.W.3d 334, 342 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004); e.g., Hankins v. State, 132 S.W.3d 380, 389 n.7 (Tex. Crim. App.), cert. denied, 125 S. Ct. 358 (2004) (admission of evidence).

Obeidat does not point to any trial objection to the admission of evidence. Obeidat thus forfeits the issue. We overrule Obeidat s issue.

Having overruled Obeidat s sole issue, we affirm.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Vance, and

Justice Reyna

Affirmed

Opinion delivered and filed September 28, 2005

Do not publish

[CR25]