Jimmy Roger Oldham v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 204th District Court of Dallas County
Annotate this CaseIN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Nos. 10-94-078-CR & 10-94-079-CR
JIMMY ROGER OLDHAM,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
From the 204th District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Nos. F91-39487-VQ & F93-32050-JQ
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Jimmy Roger Oldham appeals from two driving-while-intoxicated convictions. See Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. art. 6701l-1 (Vernon Supp. 1995) (current version at Tex. Penal Code Ann. 49.04 (Vernon 1994)). His retained attorney filed a motion to withdraw, premised on the attorney's conclusion that there are no complaints to be raised from Oldham's trial. See Oldham v. State, Nos. 10-94-078-CR & 10-94-079-CR (Tex. App. Waco, March 15, 1995) (interlocutory order) (not yet reported). We granted the motions to withdraw on March 21 after the attorney complied with our instructions. See id. slip op. at 3. Oldham's attorney informed him that he had thirty days from the date the attorney was allowed to withdraw to file a pro-se brief or a request for an extension of time to file a brief. See Johnson v. State, 885 S.W.2d 641, 647 & n.3 (Tex. App. Waco 1994) (interlocutory orders).
Oldham has not filed a pro-se brief on his own behalf. Thus, we are presented only with a brief which asserts that there are no arguable points of error in this appeal. Therefore, because we have no viable points of error to consider, the judgment is affirmed. See Tex. R. App. P. 81(b)(2), 90(a).
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Thomas,
Justice Cummings, and
Justice Vance
Affirmed
Opinion issued and filed May 3, 1995
Do not publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.