Johannes Keizer v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 220th District Court of Hamilton County
Annotate this CaseIN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-94-265-CR
JOHANNES KEIZER,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
From the 220th District Court
Hamilton County, Texas
Trial Court # 6508-A
O P I N I O N
Applicant Johannes Keizer attempts a "direct appeal from the denial of his Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus." The State contends that we do not have jurisdiction, citing Ex parte Hargett, 819 S.W.2d 866, 868 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We agree.
"It is well settled that no appeal can be had from a refusal to issue or grant a writ of habeas corpus even after a hearing." Id. A court may hold a hearing to determine whether there is sufficient cause for the writ to be issued or whether the merits of the claim should be addressed. Id. No appeal can be taken from this type of hearing. // Id.
The record of the hearing and the order entered in this case show that the court was engaged only in determining whether there was sufficient cause for the writ to be issued. Absent a hearing on the merits, Keizer may not appeal. See id.
Although Keizer alleges facts which, if true, raise serious questions about the validity of his conviction for felony D.W.I. and the effectiveness of trial counsel, // we find that we have no jurisdiction to consider the appeal. See id.
The appeal is dismissed.
BILL VANCE
Justice
Before Chief Justice Thomas,
Justice Cummings, and
Justice Vance
Appeal dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed November 16, 1994
Do not publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.