Robert Lynn Bell v. The State of Texas--Appeal from Crim Dist Ct 4 of Dallas Co of Dallas County

Annotate this Case
Bell-RL v. State /**/

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

 

No. 10-94-089-CR

&

No. 10-94-090-CR

&

No. 10-94-091-CR

 

ROBERT LYNN BELL,

Appellant

v.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

 

From the Criminal District Court #4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. F93-00398-QK, F93-40678-JK,

& F93-40679-JK

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Appellant was convicted in three different offenses of aggravated kidnapping, aggravated robbery, and aggravated sexual assault. All three convictions arose from plea bargain agreements. In the three underlying cases, the punishment did not exceed that recommended by the prosecution and agreed to by Appellant and his attorney. The Rules of Appellate Procedure require that, to pursue an appeal under such circumstances, the Appellant must state in his notice of appeal that he obtained the court's permission to appeal or that he is appealing those matters raised by written motion filed prior to trial. Tex. R. App. P. 40(b)(1).

Appellant's general notice of appeal is insufficient to confer jurisdiction on this court. See Lyon v. State, 872 S.W.2d 732 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994); Davis v. State, 870 S.W.2d 43 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994).

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

 

Before Chief Justice Thomas,

Justice Cummings, and

Justice Vance

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed September 14, 1994

Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.