Abbott v. City of San Antonio (Opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Justia Opinion Summary

The Supreme Court vacated the judgment of the court of appeals affirming the trial court's judgment issuing in July 2021 a temporary restraining order prohibiting enforcement of executive order GA-38, holding that this case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this Court's opinion in Abbott v. Harris County, 22-0124, which concerned the scope and constitutionality of the Governor's authority under the Disaster Act to prohibit local governments from imposing mask requirements.

The City of San Antonio and Bexar County jointly filed this lawsuit challenging GA-38, which prohibited local officials from requiring masks in response to the coronavirus epidemic. The district court issued a temporary restraining order prohibiting enforcement of the executive order and then temporarily enjoined the Governor and others from enforcing GA-38 to the extent that such a requirement would interfere with the local official's authority to require masks in government-owed buildings and schools. The court of appeals affirmed the temporary injunction. In light of this Court's decision in Abbott v. Harris County, the Supreme Court vacated the judgment below, holding that remand was required.

Download PDF
Supreme Court of Texas No. 21-1079 Greg Abbott, in His Official Capacity as Governor of Texas, et al., Petitioners, v. City of San Antonio and Bexar County, Respondents On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas Argued February 22, 2023 JUSTICE BLACKLOCK delivered the opinion of the Court. This case and its companion cases—Abbott v. Jenkins, 21-1080, and Abbott v. Harris County, 22-0124—concern the division of power between the Governor and local officials during the response to the coronavirus pandemic. In each case, we are asked about the scope and constitutionality of the Governor’s authority under the Disaster Act to prohibit local governments from imposing mask requirements. Beginning in April 2020, San Antonio Mayor Ron Nirenberg, Bexar County Judge Nelson Wolff, Bexar County Health Authority Junda Woo, and San Antonio City Manager Erik Walsh issued various orders requiring masks in certain circumstances. In July 2021, the Governor issued executive order GA-38, which prohibited local officials from requiring masks. The city and county jointly filed this lawsuit. The district court issued a temporary restraining order prohibiting enforcement of GA-38, which this Court stayed. In re Abbott, No. 21-0687 (Tex. Aug. 15, 2021) (order). The district court then temporarily enjoined the Governor and others from enforcing GA-38 to the extent that such enforcement would interfere with the local officials’ authority to require masks in government-owned buildings and schools. City of San Antonio v. Abbott, No. 2021CI16133 (Aug. 16, 2021) (order granting temporary injunction). That injunction, which bound the Governor and others who would enforce GA-38, was automatically superseded by the State’s appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 29.1(b). The court of appeals reinstated the temporary injunction pending appeal. Abbott v. City of San Antonio, No. 04-21-00342-CV (Tex. App.—San Antonio Aug. 19, 2021) (order). Again, this Court stayed temporary relief. In re Abbott, No. 21-0720 (Tex. Aug. 26, 2021) (order). The court of appeals then affirmed the temporary injunction, concluding that GA-38 could not lawfully override the local orders. 648 S.W.3d 498, 508–11 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2021). None of the injunctions issued by the lower courts has been enforceable during the pendency of this appeal. We granted the State’s petition for review and consolidated this case for oral argument with Abbott v. Jenkins, 21-1080, and Abbott v. Harris County, 22-0124. After the case was argued, the Governor 2 allowed GA-38 to expire in response to the enactment of Senate Bill 29, which generally prohibits governmental mask requirements in response to the pandemic. Act of May 28, 2023, 88th Leg., R.S., ch. 336, § 1, sec. 81B.002(a), 2023 Tex. Sess. Law Serv. ch. 336 (to be codified at TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE § 81B.002(a)). In light of our decision today in Abbott v. Harris County, 22-0124, the judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, the temporary injunction is dissolved, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Abbott v. Harris County. James D. Blacklock Justice OPINION DELIVERED: June 30, 2023 3
Primary Holding

The Supreme Court vacated the judgment of the court of appeals affirming the trial court's judgment issuing in July 2021 a temporary restraining order prohibiting enforcement of executive order GA-38, holding that this case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this Court's opinion in Abbott v. Harris County, 22-0124, which concerned the scope and constitutionality of the Governor's


Disclaimer: Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.