IN RE THE STATE OF TEXAS (Order)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS NO. 22-1044 IN RE STATE OF TEXAS ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ORDERED: On November 8, 2022, we stayed a temporary restraining order that extended voting hours in Harris County to 8 p.m. on election day, explaining that voting should “occur only as permitted by Texas Election Code Section 41.032.” No. 22-0997, In re State (Nov. 8, 2022 order). In that same order, we directed that “[l]ater cast votes”—i.e., votes cast by persons who were not “inside or waiting to enter the polling place at 7 p.m.” on election day—should be segregated. See TEX. ELEC. CODE § 41.032(a) (“A voter who has not voted before the time for closing the polls is entitled to vote after that time if the voter is inside or waiting to enter the polling place at 7 p.m.”). In this mandamus proceeding, which challenges Harris County election officials’ processing of the “later cast votes,” we grant the following temporary relief under Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.10(b): Respondents are directed to conduct the canvass of the November 2022 election as required by the Election Code. As part of the canvass, respondents are ordered to separately identify in the vote tabulations the number of “later cast votes” for each candidate in each race and for or against each proposition, so that candidates, the parties, and this Court may ascertain whether the “later cast votes” would be outcome-determinative and so that the parties can assess the extent to which further litigation is warranted. Respondents are ordered to provide the Court with a copy of the canvass results, including the separately tabulated “later cast votes,” as soon as they are available. The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court. Done at the City of Austin, this Tuesday, November 22, 2022. BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BY CLAUDIA JENKS, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
