CESAR ROMERO, M.D., ANTHONY CLAXTON, M.D., AND DAVID KORMAN, M.D. v. JACOB LIEBERMAN ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF LARRY LIEBERMAN, DECEASED (other)

Annotate this Case
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

============

No. 10-0134

============

Cesar Romero, M.D., Anthony Claxton, M.D., and

David Korman, M.D., Petitioners,

v.

Jacob Lieberman on behalf of the estate of

Larry Lieberman, deceased, Respondent

====================================================

On Petition for Review from the

Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas

====================================================

PER CURIAM

After Larry Lieberman, a psychiatric patient at Terrell State Hospital, died of sepsis allegedly as a result of a complete lack of care, his father, respondent Jacob Lieberman, sued petitioners, Doctors Romero, Claxton, and Korman. The doctors moved to dismiss the suit against them under section 101.106(f) of the Texas Tort Claims Act, Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code 101.106(f), and brought a plea to the jurisdiction on the same ground, claiming that the suit was based on conduct within the general scope of their employment with the State Hospital and could have been brought against the State Hospital. The trial court dismissed the action. On respondent Lieberman s appeal, the court of appeals reversed. No. 05-08-01636-CV, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 8414, at *5, 2009 WL 3595128, at *2 (Tex. App. Dallas Nov. 3, 2009) (mem. op.).

While this case has been pending on appeal, we have decided Franka v. Velasquez, ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tex. 2011), holding that, for purposes of section 101.106(f), a tort action is brought under the Texas Tort Claims Act, even if the government has not waived its immunity for such actions. ___ S.W.3d at ___. In light of Franka, we grant the doctors petition for review, and without hearing oral argument, reverse the court of appeals judgment and remand the case to the court of appeals for further proceedings. Tex. R. App. P. 59.1.

Opinion delivered: January 21, 2010

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.