Suenan Gober v. Bulkley Properties, LLC Appeal from 62nd District Court of Hopkins County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-20-00041-CV SUENAN GOBER, Appellant V. BULKLEY PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 62nd District Court Hopkins County, Texas Trial Court No. CV43552 Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss MEMORANDUM OPINION Suenan Gober, appellant, filed a notice of appeal in this matter on July 20, 2020. Although Gober has filed a docketing statement, she has not tendered the mandatory $205.00 filing fee associated with the appeal, see TEX. R. APP. P. 5, and has not filed proof of indigency in lieu of a filing fee, see TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. “A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay—at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order that is just.” TEX. R. APP. P. 5. By letter dated August 25, 2020, Gober was provided with notice of and an opportunity to cure this defect. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). The clerk’s letter further warned Gober that, if she did not submit an adequate response to the notice by September 4, 2020, this appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution and for failure to comply with the above-cited rules. Gober did not pay the mandatory filing fee and did not file proof of indigency in lieu of a filing fee. Although counsel for Gober indicated on October 7, 2020, that he intended to file a motion to avoid dismissal of this appeal, no such motion was filed. Accordingly, this appeal is ripe for dismissal. 2 Pursuant to Rules 42.3(b) and (c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. Josh R. Morriss, III Chief Justice Date Submitted: Date Decided: October 19, 2020 October 20, 2020 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.