Bridget Brown Parson v. Lakewind LLC, Randall Baggs, Owner, et al., and Chinn Exploration Appeal from 123rd District Court of Panola County (memorandum opinion by chief justice iii morriss)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-15-00035-CV BRIDGET BROWN PARSON, Appellant V. LAKEWIND, LLC, RANDALL BAGGS, OWNER, ET AL., AND CHINN EXPLORATION, Appellees On Appeal from the 123rd District Court Panola County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-396 Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss MEMORANDUM OPINION Previously, on October 4, 2011, the trial court had dismissed Bridget Brown Parson’s lawsuit due to her failure to prosecute the case. Over two and one-half years later, the trial court entered a May 21, 2015, order setting the case for trial and, subsequently, a June 4, 2015, order striking that trial setting. Parson seeks to appeal from the June 4 order granting Lakewind, LLC’s “Motion to Strike Order Setting Trial.” By letter of August 13, 2015, we notified Parson that it appeared we lacked jurisdiction over this appeal because the order appealed from was void, as it was signed well after the trial court’s plenary jurisdiction had expired. We afforded Parson ten days to demonstrate proper grounds for our retention of the appeal. Having received no response as of September 8, 2015, we sua sponte consider our jurisdiction over the appeal. “A trial court retains plenary power over its judgment until that judgment becomes final.” In re Sheppard, 193 S.W.3d 181, 186 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding) (citing Fruehauf Corp. v. Carrillo, 848 S.W.2d 83, 84 (Tex. 1993)). “It is well-settled that an order signed after the trial court’s plenary power has expired is void.” Id. The order of October 4, 2011, dismissing Parson’s lawsuit was a final, appealable order from which Parson could have perfected an appeal, though the time for filing a direct appeal from that dismissal expired long ago. When that dismissal became final thirty days after it was signed, the trial court’s plenary power expired. Consequently, any orders entered by the trial court after that time, including the May 21, 2015, order setting the case for trial and the June 4, 2015, order striking the trial setting, were void. 2 Our jurisdiction, as an appellate court, is constitutional and statutory in nature. See TEX. CONST. art. V, § 6; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.220 (West Supp. 2014). Unless we are granted specific authority over an appeal from a particular type of order, we have jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). It is clear under Texas law that an appellate court lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal from an order signed after the trial court’s plenary power has expired, such as the order from which Parson attempts to appeal in this case. See State ex rel. Latty v. Owens, 907 S.W.2d 484, 486 (Tex. 1995). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Josh R. Morriss, III Chief Justice Date Submitted: Date Decided: September 15, 2015 September 16, 2015 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
