Thomas Lloyd Taunton v. The State of Texas Appeal from 336th District Court of Fannin County (memorandum opinion )

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-14-00160-CR THOMAS LLOYD TAUNTON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 336th District Court Fannin County, Texas Trial Court No. CR-13-24755 Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess MEMORANDUM OPINION Thomas Lloyd Taunton was convicted by a jury of the capital murder of his stepfather, Harold Harpst, see TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.03(a)(7)(A) (West Supp. 2014), and of the murder of his mother, Willie Sue Harpst, see TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.02(b) (West 2011). Taunton was convicted of both crimes, was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole and fined $10,000.00 for the capital murder of Harold, and was sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of Willie Sue. Taunton appeals both convictions. Taunton has filed a single consolidated brief in both cases raising a single appellate issue. Taunton appeals from his conviction for the capital murder of Harold under our cause number 06-14-00159-CR. Here, Taunton appeals from his conviction for the murder of Willie Sue. Specifically, Taunton claims that the affidavits submitted by law enforcement officers in support of their applications for warrants authorizing searches of his truck and trailer and of a rental car he was driving were insufficient under the Fourth Amendment to support issuance of the warrants. Consequently, he contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence seized as a result of those invalid searches. We addressed this issue in detail in our opinion of this date in Taunton’s appeal in cause number 06-14-00159-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that Taunton has not shown error in this case. 2 We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Ralph K. Burgess Justice Date Submitted: Date Decided: June 3, 2015 June 19, 2015 Do Not Publish 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.