Janet Renee Walker v. The State of TexasAppeal from 6th District Court of Lamar County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-13-00134-CR JANET RENEE WALKER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 6th District Court Lamar County, Texas Trial Court No. 24969 Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter MEMORANDUM OPINION Janet Renee Walker has attempted to appeal from her conviction for driving while intoxicated. On our review of the clerk s record, we noted that the trial court certified this to be a negotiated plea agreement case in which Walker has no right of appeal. By letter dated July 11, 2013, we informed appellant of this potential jurisdictional defect and afforded her ten days in which to respond. Walker responded, through counsel, but her response contains nothing to persuade us that we have jurisdiction over this appeal. In a negotiated plea agreement case, i.e., one in which the defendant entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment assessed does not exceed that recommended by the State and agreed to by the defendant, a defendant may appeal only (1) issues that were raised by a written motion that was both filed and ruled on before trial or (2) after obtaining the trial court s permission to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Further, this Court is required to dismiss an appeal if, as in this case, the trial court s certification indicates that there is no right of appeal. See id. Because the trial court certified that Walker has no right of appeal and because the record before us contains nothing to suggest that the certification is incorrect, see Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005), we must dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). 2 We, therefore, dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. Jack Carter Justice Date Submitted: Date Decided: July 25, 2013 July 26, 2013 Do Not Publish 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
